Research and Resources

Six modes of co-production for sustainability

August 5, 2021
Making and Using Actionable Knowledge
Authors:
Carina Wyborn Josephine M. Chambers Melanie E. Ryan Robin S. Reid Maraja Riechers Anca Serban Nathan J. Bennett Christopher Cvitanovic María E. Fernández-Giménez Kathleen A. Galvin Bruce E. Goldstein Nicole L. Klenk Maria Tengö Ruth Brennan Jessica J. Cockburn Rosemary Hill Claudia Munera Jeanne L. Nel Henrik Österblom Angela T. Bednarek Elena M. Bennett Amos Brandeis Lakshmi Charli-Joseph Paul Chatterton K. Curran Pongchai Dumrongrojwatthana América Paz Durán Salamatu J. Fada Jean-David Gerber Jonathan M. H. Green Angela M. Guerrero Tobias Haller Andra-Ioana Horcea-Milcu Beria Leimona Jasper Montana Renee Rondeau Marja Spierenburg Patrick Steyaert Julie G. Zaehringer Rebecca Gruby Jon Hutton Tomas Pickering

The promise of co-production to address complex sustainability challenges is compelling. Yet, co-production, the collaborative weaving of research and practice, encompasses diverse aims, terminologies and practices, with poor clarity over their implications. To explore this diversity, we systematically mapped differences in how 32 initiatives from 6 continents co-produce diverse outcomes for the sustainable development of ecosystems at local to global scales. We found variation in their purpose for utilizing co-production, understanding of power, approach to politics and pathways to impact. A cluster analysis identified six modes of co-production: (1) researching solutions; (2) empowering voices; (3) brokering power; (4) reframing power; (5) navigating differences and (6) reframing agency. No mode is ideal; each holds unique potential to achieve particular outcomes, but also poses unique challenges and risks. Our analysis provides a heuristic tool for researchers and societal actors to critically explore this diversity and effectively navigate trade-offs when co-producing sustainability.